Header graphic for print
Food Poison Journal Food Poisoning Outbreaks and Litigation: Surveillance and Analysis

Cantaloupe vs. al-Qaeda: What’s More Dangerous?

Michael Meurer Op-ed

One of the most important revelations from the international drama over Edward Snowden’s NSA leaks in May is the exposure of a nearly lunatic disproportion in threat assessment and spending by the US government. This disproportion has been spawned by a fear-based politics of terror that mandates unlimited money and media attention for even the most tendentious terrorism threats, while lethal domestic risks such as contaminated food from our industrialized agribusiness system are all but ignored. A comparison of federal spending on food safety intelligence versus antiterrorism intelligence brings the irrationality of the threat assessment process into stark relief.

In 2011, the year of Osama bin Laden’s death, the State Department reported that 17 Americans were killed in all terrorist incidents worldwide. The same year, a single outbreak of listeriosis from tainted cantaloupe killed 33 people in the United States. Foodborne pathogens also sickened 48.7 million, hospitalized 127,839 and caused a total of 3,037 deaths. This is a typical year, not an aberration.

We have more to fear from contaminated cantaloupe than from al-Qaeda, yet the United States spends $75 billion per year spread across 15 intelligence agencies in a scattershot attempt to prevent terrorism, illegally spying on its own citizens in the process. By comparison, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is struggling to secure $1.1 billion in the 2014 federal budget for its food inspection program, while tougher food processing and inspection regulations passed in 2011 are held up by agribusiness lobbying in Congress. The situation is so dire that Jensen Farms, the company that produced the toxic cantaloupe that killed 33 people in 2011, had never been inspected by the FDA.

Keep Reading at Truthout.org.

Michael Meurer is President of Meurer Group & Associates, a California-Colorado political consulting firm. Michael has served as a Senior Advisor to the California Democratic Party and co-founded the Courage Campaign, where he served as Deputy Chair.

  • J T

    I think the “war on food poisoning” has no better chances of success than the “war on terrorism.” You can never make all the food 100% safe, and even when every correct system is in place, sh*t still happens, sometimes literally. What we really need to focus on is Food Security, which is tied very closely to food safety. Every year, we rely more on imported food than we did the year before, and the best American farm land is steadily being sold off to commercial and housing development. Even “Ag Reserve” land is not safe, since money talks, and the big developers have no problem getting their tentacles into every lucrative crevice. Soon, ALL of our food will come from mexico & china and other 3rd world countries, where “food safety” is a foreign word and the microbes rule the day.