If The Kids Go To A Petting Zoo - Make Sure They Wash Their Hands, WELL.

This months MMWR contains a report on an outbreak of shiga-toxin producing E. coli O157 at a petting zoo in Florida in 2007. 

Unfortunately, this is nothing new.  The "editorial note" states that between 1991-2005, the CDC received reports of 32 outbreaks of E. coli O157 that "were associated with animals in public settings."  Beginning in 2001, the CDC and then the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV) has provided a compendium of recommendations to avoid outbreaks like this.   The CDC states, however, that venues in some of these outbreaks were not in compliance with those guidelines. 

Apparantly, those failures continue.  In the 2007 petting zoo outbreak, the CDC found that attendees of the petting zoo "were not instructed in appropriate handwashing technique, and the staff member was stationed too far from the handwashing facilities to observe handwashing behavior." 

E. coli O157:H7 is generally found in ruminants, including cows, sheep, and goats.  So, if your child pets one of these animals, make sure his or her hands are washed thoroughly with soap and running water immediately after contact.   

Senator Gregg Talks Food Safety Legislation

As part of Marler Clark's work with Outbreak, Inc.  I will be speaking at the Northwest Food Processors Association Executive Summit in Bend, Oregon on Saturday.   I will be a member of a panel discussing the numerous pending food safety bills, and their potential impact.   While preparing for the talk, I found Senator Judd Gregg's (NH) Op-Ed regarding one of the more prominent pieces of pending legislation, "The Food Safety Modernization Act." 

Bill has discussed much of the pending legislation on his blog.   One of the focuses of the Food Safety Modernization Act is increased inspection at food processing plants.   Part of the proposal would base the frequency of inspection on the level of risk purportedly associated with the particular food being produced.   The hope is that by prioritizing inspection based on perceived risk, that limited regulatory dollars will be well spent.

I wonder what incentives such a system would create.  On the positive side, a business would be motivated to create a safe product, because, among other reasons, their procedure will be less encumberd by inspection.  On the other hand, I worry that there might be an incentive to downplay the potential risks involved with a product in order to streamline a process.   We are a long way from having a law on the books, but it will be interesting to see how it plays out.

Pistactachio Salmonella Outbreak Confusion

Setton International Foods, Inc., has just announced another expansion of its previously announced recall for Salmonella contaminated pistachios. 

This announcement is a clarification to their earlier clarification issued on April 20, 2009 which specified that a small amount of the 2007 pistachio crop that was packaged alongside the 2008 pistachio crop was included in their expanded voluntary recall announced on April 6, 2009 due to potential contamination with the Salmonella organism.

Umm, I thought the whole point of a clarification was to make clear that which was not previously clear--to free the mind from ambiguity.  So if this clarification clarifies the earlier clarification, are we all clear now?

I say just head over the FDA's website and check out the complete list of products currently affected.  And as the FDA's notice makes clear, "consumers should not eat pistachios or food products containing them (such as pistachio bakery goods and pistachio ice cream) until they can determine that the products do not contain pistachios recalled by Setton."

The Scope of the Recent Salmonella Sprouts Outbreak

Press accounts, as well as those from the CDC, addressing the number of sick people in the ongoing Salmonella sprouts outbreak are a little misleading if you don't know what is actually being said.  The reality of these outbreaks (whether E. coli O157, Salmonella, or anything else) is that the number of people who are actually ill, as opposed to the number who have a stool sample that tests positive, is much bigger than the reports would indicate. 

In fact, one of the leading studies on the subject suggests (and this is obviously not a bright line rule) that the number of actual victims in a given outbreak, as opposed to merely those with positive stool samples, is as much as 38 times the number of stool sample confirmed individuals.  I hope that makes sense.  Paul Mead et al, explain it much more clearly in their article, which I will post in a few minutes (technical difficulties). 

 

E.coli Found in Indiana Creek

Yesterday, there was a report of  E. coli contamination in the Merrimack River in Massachusetts.   Today a report of a positive test from the Greenwood Creek in Greenwood, Indiana.   The creek is apparently a popular swimming spot in the summer.   General tests for E. coli do not indicate whether or not E. coli O157:H7 is present.   The dangerous bacteria is, however, one of the many strains of E. coli

Waterborne E. coli presents a risk to human health, particularly where drinking water is involved.  Last summer hundreds were sickened in Oklahoma in an outbreak of E. coli O111, another pathogenic strain in the E. coli family.  Health officials have tied that outbreak to well water served in a restaurant.

Interview an E. coli Lawyer (not a vampire)

Brandy Baltzell is a freshman at Millersville University.  She is going to major in biochemistry, and will soon, I think, be doing great work with E. coli O157:H7 and other nasty little foodborne pathogens.  I was happy to play what role I could in the recent research paper that she wrote, discussing the characteristics of E. coli O157:H7, including how it spreads and what it does to the body.  See Brandy's paper here.

Guide for Sprout Growers to avoid Salmonella and E. coli Lawsuits

ATTENTION SPROUT GROWERS:  If you haven't seen it already, read the FDA's industry guidance on "Reducing Microbial Food Safety Hazards on Sprouted Seeds."  If you have seen it, then see it again.  But don't stop there:  make your employees see it, and then meet with your staff to determine the best ways to implement anything contained in the FDA guide that you haven't already.  AND DON'T STOP THERE:  then contribute a little money or time to research and development so that the 33 outbreaks sprouts have caused since 1990 stays at 33 outbreaks, and the FDA stops telling people not to buy or consume your product.  That can't be good for business. 

Nevada Hospitalization linked to Salmonella in Spices

According to this Mercury News story, a 77 year old woman from Dayton, Nevada was among those sickened with Salmonella.   An outbreak of illness has led to the recall of white and black pepper distributed by Union International Food Co.and CJ United Corp.  There have been nine such illnesses reported in Nevada.  Thankfully, the Dayton resident is reportedly the only Nevada member of the outbreak to be hospitalized.

E. coli in the Merrimack River?

 

The Daily News in North Andover, Massachusetts is reporting on water quality issues in the Merrimack River.  According to the story, the Merrrimack River Watershed Council states that E. coli has been found in the river.

Apparently, it was not an isolated incident.  According to the story, the river was unsafe for swimming on 6% of wet weather days during the study, based on the applicable state standards.  Worse, "state standards for safe E. coli levels are lax when viewed against standards set by other water quality governing agencies. If [one] were to measure the Merrimack River's E. coli levels against safety standards set by the 40-year-old Charles River Watershed Association, for instance, the river would be deemed unsafe for swimming and boating far more often."

E. coli is a general term for a family of common fecal bacteria.  Within that family is E. coli O157:H7, a pathogenic bacteria that can cause serious illness in humans, including hemolytic uremic syndrome, or HUS.

 

Peanut Industry Welcoming Regulation?

An article from the Press-Enterprise in Riverside, California explains that members of the peanut industry are recognizing that new legislation is necessary in light of two massive Salmonella outbreaks in the past three years.

A lobbyist for the Western Peanut Growers Association says the industry wants to be part of fixing the problem.  This is great, but should it be something new?  The article also quotes a professor estimating the total cost of the outbreak at roughly a bilion dollars.  Hmm, where have we heard that before?

No doubt that having an industry be involved in creating the legislation that regulates it makes great sense.   It just makes more sense to be ahead of the curve, as opposed to reacting (slowly) to tragedy.