Nevada Added To List Of States With Salmonella Saintpaul Cases
CDC is now counting 652 confirmed cases in the outbreak.
racterization. The marked increase in reported ill persons since the last update is not thought to be due to a large number of new infections. The number of reported ill persons increased mainly because some states improved surveillance for Salmonella in response to this outbreak and because laboratory identification of many previously submitted strains was completed. In particular, one new state, Massachusetts reported ill persons. The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Arkansas (3 persons), Arizona (34), California (8), Colorado (4), Connecticut (4), Florida (1), Georgia (14), Idaho (3), Illinois (45), Indiana (9), Kansas (9), Kentucky (1), Maryland (18), Massachusetts (12), Michigan (4), Missouri (12), New Hampshire (1), New Jersey (1), New Mexico (79), New York (18), North Carolina (1), Ohio (3), Oklahoma (17), Oregon (5), Pennsylvania (5), Rhode Island (2), Tennessee (4), Texas (265), Utah (2), Virginia (21), Vermont (1), Washington (1), Wisconsin (5), and the District of Columbia (1). Among the 316 persons with information available, illnesses began between April 10 and June 13, 2008. Patients range in age from <1 to 99 years; 50 percent are female. At least 69 persons were hospitalized. No deaths have been officially attributed to this outbreak. However, a man in his sixties who died in Texas from cancer had an infection with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Saintpaul at the time of his death. The infection may have contributed to his death.
and Human Services, is in Mexico with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) team that is looking for the source of the tomatoes carrying Salmonella Saintpaul.
According to the CDC, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, New York, Tennessee and Vermont with 61 ill persons were added to the prior list of Arizona (12 persons), California (2), Colorado (1), Connecticut (1), Idaho (2), Illinois (27), Indiana (7), Kansas (5), Michigan (2), New Mexico (39), Oklahoma (3), Oregon (3), Texas (56), Utah (1), Virginia (2), Washington (1), and Wisconsin (3) - bringing the number of ill persons to 228 and affected states to 23. There have been dozens hospitalized and one reported death in Texas.
Andrew Schneider, Senior Correspondent for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, ruined many a breakfast this morning---that’s if any of his Emerald City readers still eat bacon with their eggs.In what is apparently the first testing of swine for MRSA in the U.S., Smith and her team swabbed the noses of 209 pigs on 10 farms. They also found the bacteria among livestock workers employed by those hog operations.As they say in Seattle, "Its in the P-I" here.
On Friday, at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology in Boston, Abby Harper, one of Smith's graduate assistants, presented the results of the study on farmworkers. She said she and Michael Male tested 20 workers at the Iowa swine farms and found that 45 percent carried the same MRSA bacteria as the pigs.

Also, FDA recommends consuming raw red plum, raw red Roma, or raw red round tomatoes only if grown and harvested from the following areas that HAVE NOT BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE OUTBREAK:
Researchers have found a potentially deadly strain of tuberculosis infectionspreading through Latino communities in Southern California and suspect the disease is being imported from Mexico in unpasteurized cheese...
Tuberculosis is an infection of the lungs that kills nearly 2 million people worldwide every year. The strain of tuberculosis that researchers found in San Diego County is more often linked to cattle, but can spread to people through raw dairy products.
That particular strain remains rare, even in San Diego County, the researchers concluded. But more than 90 percent of the people who were sickened by it were Latino, mostly from Mexico.There's one error in Irving's story, his report has all unpasteurized milk and cheese being illegal in the United States. Some may wish that were true. However, the OC Register is well worth the read and can be found here.
We are wondering if the "dirty dairy" bill passes in California if states that discover unpasteurized milk could in the future just send it to the Golden State where it could be mixed into the "bacteria cocktails" for sale by retailers like Whole Foods.
Let’s call it what it is: the “dirty dairy” bill.
California has always been silly about its organic movement. Yet, it’s usually been serious about food safety and public health.
Raw milk is NOT pasteurized. According to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, more than 1,000 people got sick from raw milk and raw cheese between 1998 and 2005. More than 100 went to the hospital. Two died.
There’s a small market commercial market for raw milk in California—about 40,000 people. (Or 1/10th of one percent of all California consumers)
But with just two raw milk producers in the state, the troubled Organic Pastures of Fresno County and Claravale Farms on San Benito County, the raw milk market is big enough. OP sells to 300 retail stores, including Whole Foods.
Hang in there; we will get to the “dirty dairy” bill in a minute.
Sacramento health officials are very much aware of the destruction caused by Organic Pastures. It is implicated in both E. coli and Campylobacter outbreaks and a Listeria recall. Attorney Bill Marler represents a couple of OP’s former customers, both HUS victims with one for sure requiring a transplant.
So, California, being a serious state, opted to regulate raw milk with a scientifically measurable
standard of 10 coliform bacteria per milliliter of raw milk.
The “dirty dairies” howled and went into action, filing a lawsuit against the new state regulation. They lost. Now, the “dirty dairies” are commanding their minions, specifically Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, to introduce the “dirty dairy” bill to lift the safety standard.
The limits are there to make sure dairies are clean because dirty dairies are more likely to breed pathogens. The California Department of Food & Agriculture views the standards as “reasonable and attainable.”Current regulations allow the dairies to use independent labs and only if specific harmful pathogens are found and verified could raw milk production be halted.
Not good enough for Dean’s “dirty dairy “ bill, which would eliminate bacteria limits.
The crux of what he is saying is that what raw milk customers want to buy is the bacterium cocktail that only a “dirty dairy” can produce.
All those dairy cases at Whole Foods can get pretty confusing. Lots of people are just grabbing for a bottle of milk, and are not aware they might be buying a "bacterium cocktail." Today California is in business to protect consumers. Tomorrow, it might be in business to protect Dean's dirty dairies.