Warning issued for raw milk cheeses in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio

cheese recallThe Indiana State Board of Animal Health's Dairy Division warned consumers not to consume cheeses made from raw milk at the Grassy Meadows Dairy of Howe, Indiana, after testing conducted on the cheeses revealed high levels of staphylococcus aureus (staph) contamination in several samples of the cheeses that were produced before Wednesday.

The Board of Animal Health urged consumers to discard the following cheeses, which were sold in wedges or blocks:
  • Colby (lots 210317 and 19177).
  • Jalapeno natural cheese (lots 2617, 21017 and 11017).
  • “Homemade” cheese (lots 19267 and 19227).
  • Monterey Jack (lots 18207 and 2937).
  • Garlic pepper cheese (lot 19147).
An article in the Journal Gazette provided more information about the recall:
Grassy Meadows products were sold directly to consumers from the dairy farm, as well as more than a dozen retail health food stores in northeast Indiana. The state board is working to secure a complete list of retail outlets that carry the products.

All of the samples taken indicated higher-than-allowed levels of staph, according to the statement. No consumer illness or complaints have been reported.

Staph infections can cause nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, headache and muscle cramping, the statement said. The greatest health risk is to the very young, the very old and those with compromised immune systems.

Foods recalled for botulism, listeria contamination

Seoul Shik Poom, a Hillside, New Jersey, company, recalled frozen, salted, and dried yellow croaker products for potential contamination with clostridium botulinum, the pathogen that causes botulism poisoning, late last week.  Products recalled include:
  • BG1103 Salted Yellow Croaker (bag) 2.2 lbs
  • BG1121B Dried Yellow Croaker (bag) 4.5 lbs
  • BG1121 Dried Yellow Croaker (bag) 2.2 lbs
  • BG1122B Dried Yellow Croaker (bag) 4.5 lbs
  • BG1124 Yellow Croaker (bulk box) 29.73 lbs
  • BG1124A Yellow Croaker (bulk box) 31.6 lbs
  • BG1123 Yellow Croaker (bulk box) 30.83 lbs
According to the Press of Atlantic City, the yellow croaker products were packaged in clear plastic bags that were individually tied. They were distributed in retail stores in New Jersey, New York, and Maryland. Routine testing revealed the potential for contamination, and no illnesses have been reported in connection with these products.

In a separate recall, Ca Rem #1 Ice Cream, a SeaTac, Washington, business, recalled coconut-flavored popsicles for potential Listeria monocytogenes contamination after sampling conducted by the Washington State Department of Agriculture resulted in a positive test for Listeria. No illnesses associated with the consumption of these products have been identified. According to a report at KIRO TV.com:
The Ca Rem #1 popsicle is sold in 3-ounce un-coded plastic bags, primarily in Asian food markets and restaurants in western Washington and western Oregon.

Consumers who have purchased Ca Rem #1 popsicles should throw out the product and not eat it. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 206-720-1887.

Hepatitis A Scare at California Restaurant

Customers who ate at Chuy's Mesquite Broiler on the Rosedale Highway in Bakersfield, California, between January 4 and January 10 are being warned that they may have been exposed to the hepatitis A virus.  The Kern County Health Department issued a press release stating that customers who ate at the restaurant between those dates should receive an inoculation to prevent against hepatitis A infection.  In it, the health department provided a chart with information on the timeline for receiving preventative treatment:

Hepatitis A Treatment Schedule

KGET.com reported that the health department had run out of vaccinations, but would be able to treat all individuals who were exposed at the restaurant.  According to KGET, the restaurant has been cleaned and re-inspected.  The worker will not resume responsibilities at the restaurant until proven healthy.

According to the Kern County Department of Health Press Release:
On average, symptoms of hepatitis A occur within 28 days following exposure and may include fever, fatigue, body ache, nausea, abdominal discomfort, dark colored urine and pale stools. Jaundice or yellowing of the skin or whites of the eyes may follow. The illness usually lasts 1-2 weeks, although in rare cases, symptoms can be severe and recovery can take several months. Many people infected with Hepatitis A may have no symptoms or may have mild symptoms without jaundice. For symptom related questions, please contact your medical provider.

Hepatitis A virus is spread by close physical contact and through fecal contamination of liquids or food that does not get cooked and is then consumed. Close contacts, including household and sexual partners, are at risk for acquiring Hepatitis A from an infected person. The incubation period is 2 to 7 weeks. Prompt diagnosis is a benefit in minimizing the spread of infection. Thorough handwashing with soap and warm water after using the toilet and before handling food is the most important factor in preventing the spread of the disease.

Long Term Impacts of Food Illness Prompts STOP To Start National Register

 Safe Tables Our Priority (STOP), the nation's advocacy group for victims of food-borne illness,  this month is beginning the first national registry of food-poisoning survivors with long-term health problems — people willing to share their medical histories with scientists in hopes of boosting much-needed research.

STOP's action comes as the Associated Press's health and medical reporter writes about  "the dirty little secret of food poisoning: E. coli and certain other foodborne illnesses can sometimes trigger serious health problems months or years after patients survived that initial bout. Scientists only now are unraveling a legacy that has largely gone unnoticed."

The AP goes on to report:

What they've spotted so far is troubling. In interviews with The Associated Press, they described high blood pressure, kidney damage, even full kidney failure striking 10 to 20 years later in people who survived severe E. coli infection as children, arthritis after a bout of salmonella or shigella, and a mysterious paralysis that can attack people who just had mild symptoms of campylobacter.

"Folks often assume once you're over the acute illness, that's it, you're back to normal and that's the end of it," said Dr. Robert Tauxe of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The long-term consequences are "an important but relatively poorly documented, poorly studied area of foodborne illness."

This squares to STOP's experience.  The organization believes the true cost of food-borne illness on society  is being drastically under-estimates.  STOP's hears from victims who develop medical conditions years later.  It hopes the register will be a way for science to study the true impacts.

The AP's story can be found here.

Botulism Forces New Era To Call Back All It Produced In Last 5 Years

Michigan's troubled New Era Canning Company was forced on Friday night to expand its botulism recall to all canned green beans and garbanzo beans distributed by the company nationwide over the last five years.

That could be a great deal of product.  According to the company's website:

  • New Era Canning now processes over 100 million pounds of produce annually for the private label industry.
  • New Era's customers' products are on the shelves from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from the Great Lakes to the Deep South.

However, New Era began recalling some of its various bean products and labels beginning last Dec. 21.   Its addition of No. 10 cans of green beans and garbanzo beans to its now month-old recall list came in at about 8 pm, Friday. 

But exactly one hour later,  the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)  announced the much expanded recall.  Here's what it said about the investigation:

FDA and the Michigan Department of Agriculture launched a joint investigation of New Era's processing plant. This investigation resulted in the identification of C. botulinum contamination in several lots of canned green beans and one lot of garbanzo beans, the identification of serious food violations, and this expanded recall.

The FDA's complete release can be found here.   A few more highlights:

    • C. botulinum can cause botulism, a serious and sometimes life-threatening condition. The affected cans are large institutional-sized containers, weighing approximately six and a half pounds
    • To date, no illnesses have been reported to the FDA; however, consumers should not consume these products, even if they appear to be normal, because of the potential serious risk to health. Consumers who have the affected products or who have used them in recipes should immediately throw the cans and food away.
    • New Era took this voluntary action in the interest of public health in accordance with FDA's recall request. The company is taking immediate action to retrieve all inventories of the products throughout the distribution chain, including consumers' homes, nursing homes, schools, warehouses, restaurants, retail stores, health care facilities, and other facilities.

FDA is also keeping track of New Era's whole bout with botulism on a separate website that can be found here.

Less we forget, FDA reminds us how serious botulism can be:

    • Clostridium botulinum bacterium spores have the potential for growth that produces a toxin that causes a potentially fatal form of food poisoning - botulism.  Symptoms of botulism poisoning in humans can begin from 6 hours to 2 weeks after eating food that contains the toxin.
    • Symptoms may include double vision, blurred vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing, and muscle weakness that moves progressively down the body, affecting the shoulders first, then descending to the upper arms, lower arms, thighs, and calves.
    •  Botulism poisoning also can cause paralysis of the breathing muscles, which can result in death unless assistance with breathing (mechanical ventilation) is provided.
    • Individuals who have these symptoms and who may have recently eaten the green beans or garbanzo beans currently under recall or other food products made with these items should seek immediate medical attention.

  •  

Ground beef source of E. coli

ecoli-infosheetThis week's food safety infosheet (pdf) from the International Food Safety Network focuses on what we learned this week - that ground beef is once again the source of a multi-state E. coli outbreak.  At least five people in Wisconsin and one California resident became ill with E. coli infections after consuming meat produced by Rochester Meats of Michigan.  According to the Food Safety and Inspection Service's recall announcement from last weekend:
The problem was discovered through an investigation initiated by the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services and the California Department of Public Health into five illnesses in Wisconsin and one illness in California. Anyone concerned about an illness should contact a physician.

The ground beef products subject to recall were produced on Oct. 30, 2007, and Nov. 6, 2007. The products subject to recall were shipped to distributors nationwide for further distribution to restaurants and food service institutions. These products were not available for purchase by consumers in retail establishments.

Listeria found in 16 of 100 samples taken from dairy

The outbreak investigation into the Listeria outbreak traced to the consumption of Whittier Farms milk products revealed contamination in several areas of the milk plant, according to reports from the Boston Herald and the Metro West Daily News

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health announced today:
More than 100 environmental and milk samples were taken from the processing plant as part of the investigation. A total of twelve milk samples and four environmental samples tested positive for varying strains of Listeria contamination (see summary below).

The findings do not pinpoint where the contamination of the milk occurred, but they do suggest that Listeria bacteria colonized somewhere in the processing plant and that the bacteria entered the milk products at some point during the production process. Records indicate that the plant’s equipment met federal standards for time, temperature and flow for effective pasteurization, however, pasteurization at the processing plant will be further examined.

The presence of Listeria in the physical plant of the facility is consistent with contamination occurring during post-pasteurizing processing and bottling. One theory under consideration by health officials is that cleaning activities at the plant may have unintentionally caused contamination of the processing equipment allowing bacteria to enter the finished milk products. Three of the four positive environmental tests for Listeria were collected from sections of the plant that are considered part of the post-pasteurization areas of the facility.
Listeria is the common name for the pathogenic or disease-causing bacterium known as Listeria monocytogenes. It is a foodborne illness that when ingested causes an infection known as listeriosis (Cossart & Bierne, 2001). Approximately 2,500 illnesses and 500 deaths are attributed to listeriosis in the United States annually (CDC, 2005).

Listeria is ubiquitous in the environment, and can be isolated from wild and domestic animals, birds, insects, soil, wastewater, and vegetation. The bacterium easily comes into contact with farm animals as it has been found to be present in grazing areas, stale water, and poorly prepared animal feed. In addition to being present in the environment, Listeria can live in the intestines of humans, animals and birds for long periods of time without causing infection. Because Listeria is present in nearly every environment - including in some food processing facilities - numerous opportunities for contamination exist during the food production process (Cossart & Bierne, 2001).

US Food Safety Profiled, Part III

imported-foodIn the third of its three-part series on US food safety, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution published Health Day's shopping list of US food safety solutions.  This last part focuses on what's to come for food safety -- changes are needed in our food safety net, but what changes are needed, and how drastic do those changes need to be?
  • Some have proposed a federal "superagency" that would take on the food safety responsibilities currently housed within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).  Some of the reasoning behind this idea was expressed early on in the article by food safety experts.
Dr. Pascal James Imperato, head of the department of preventive medicine and community health at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center commented, "Food is not produced, processed or distributed the way it was 20 to 30 years ago. Farming is now a major agribusiness, and it introduces a variety of problems that didn't exist before. It's much more complicated and can't be addressed by regulations that were written 30 years ago."

And Jessica Milano, author of "Spoiled: Keeping Tainted Food Off America's Tables", remarked, "You have a system that developed organically from the turn of the [20th] century. As economies developed with more commercial food manufacturers and multi-ingredient products, you have some overlaps and redundancies."
  • Mandatory recall authority for the FDA is discussed as an option for improving food safety, but some say recall authority is not necessary since companies typically cooperate when FDA approaches them about recalling product.
  • And, as mentioned yesterday, the safety of food imports is an important challenge going forward.  Today's article once again focused on imports:
The need for solutions is taking on added urgency, with the consumption of imported foods soaring in the last 10 years. Government statistics show that from 2003 to 2005 alone, food imports rose from 9.3 million shipments a year to 13.8 million shipments annually. Now, imported foods make up 13 percent of the typical American diet.

But, according to Milano, "as the volume of imports keeps rising but the number of [FDA] inspectors doesn't, the percentage of foods that is actually getting checked is getting squeezed."

The FDA's own statistics show that its inspectors sample only 1.3 percent of all food being sent to the United States from other countries.
  • There is also much debate about the need for additional food inspectors, which is addressed in the article.  And an increase in food inspectors would result in an increase in the amount of food entering the country that would be inspected.  Imports and inspectors essentially go hand-in-hand.  FDA Commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach provided his views on inspections and food safety in regards to imports:
"But we realize the world is changing," von Eschenbach acknowledged during a November 2007 teleconference after the FDA presented its Food Protection Plan to the White House. "There was a time when we produced the food ourselves. Now we've noticed that much of this food comes to us 365 days a year, because it is being produced in other parts of the world.

"Globalization has radically changed our food supply and our food-supply chain," von Eschenbach added. And that means, he said, that the FDA needs to catch up with those changes.

US Food Safety Profiled, Part II

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and HealthDay continued their coverage on the US food supply today.  This time, though, the focus wasn't on foods produced in the US - it was on foods imported from countries such as China, Mexico, and Costa Rica.  Imported produce such as green onions and cantaloupe have led to hepatitis A and Salmonella outbreaks in recent years, and concerns about the quality of imported foods have risen.

Today's article profiled Richard Miller, a Marler Clark client who contracted hepatitis A and received a liver transplant after eating Mexican green onions at a Chi-Chi's restaurant in 2003.  It also featured a discussion on several hot food safety topics:
  • Melamine in pet food, antifreeze in toothpaste, and chemical-contaminated fish feed resulted in large recalls of imported products this year.  Illness and death due to imported products such as these has increased American consumers' skepticism about whether imported foods are safe to eat.
  • An increase in the availability of fresh produce year-round through import programs has led to an increase in the amount of food we consume that contain high levels of pesticides.  According to the article's authors, the source of the problem is under-funding and a lack of resources at the Food and Drug Administration:
Trouble is, inspections by the FDA -- either at the source of production or at the borders -- can't keep up. The agency is responsible for inspecting all imported foods with the exception of meat and egg products, which are covered by the Food Safety and Inspection Service, part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Overall, "there's been an 81 percent drop [in FDA inspections] since 1972," noted Michael Doyle, director of the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia, in Griffin. "That's a huge reduction, and, at the same time, compared to 1972, we have a huge amount more of food imports."

In fact, the FDA's own data show that the number of inspectors at its Office of Regulatory Affairs dropped from 1,642 in 2003 to 1,389 in 2005 -- even as food imports rose from 9.3 million shipments per year to more than 13.8 million shipments annually.

The reason for the shortfall is simple, Doyle said: "Reduced budgets."
  • Finally, the article discusses the traceability of products.  In the United States, public health officials are fairly successful at identifying the source of outbreaks beyond a brand - they can trace spinach to a specific field or supplier and meat to a particular slaughter house.  But in developing countries, some of which we import from, trace-back systems are not fully in place and can complicate outbreak investigations.
More information about illnesses caused by contaminated foods can be found at foodborneillness.com. 

South Dakota Salmonella outbreak linked to illness in other states

Public health officials in South Dakota have confirmed 22 cases of Salmonella Newport that is similar to a strain of Salmonella Newport that has been identified as causing illness among residents of four other states.  An outbreak investigation is under way to determine whether victims of the outbreak ate the same food, but so far investigators have not been able to pinpoint the source of the outbreak. 

Genetic "fingerprinting" of the Salmonella strain isolated from victims' stool has helped public health agencies in the five states and at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in their investigation.  The process of obtaining the DNA fingerprint is called Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis, or PFGE. This technique is used to separate the DNA of the bacterial isolate into its component parts. It operates by causing alternating electric fields to run the DNA through a flat gel matrix of agarose, a polysaccharide obtained from agar. The pattern of bands of the DNA fragments — or “fingerprints” — in the gel after exposure to the electrical current is unique for each strain and sub-type of bacteria. By performing this procedure, scientists can identify hundreds of strains of E. coli O157:H7 as well as strains of listeria and campylobacter, and other pathogenic bacteria.  The PFGE pattern of the bacteria can then be compared and matched up to the PFGE pattern of the strain of infected persons who consumed the contaminated product. When PFGE patterns match, they, along with solid epidemiological work, are proof that the contaminated product was the source of a person's illness.

The Rapid City Journal reported on the outbreak today:
So far, health officials have confirmed 22 cases of a specific strain of the bacterial-borne intestinal disorder in the four states. All of South Dakota's 11 cases -- nine adults and two children -- were in the Black Hills area. Six of the 11 victims were hospitalized, five at Rapid City Regional Hospital.
"Everybody's recovering," state epidemiologist Lon Kightlinger of the South Dakota Department of Health in Pierre said Monday. "But since we've had so many of these cases hospitalized, which is fairly unusual, it leads me to believe it is a fairly potent strain."